Skip to content

Verification

CategoryVerificationStatusReviewed / PartialLast reviewed2026-09-12

Verification is MoreBC2’s evidence layer: dated runtime records, direct public-service observations, release-integrity records, open questions, and test plans.

Start with the Verification evidence index. It is the canonical current evidence summary.

A dated record is preserved for the environment/version actually tested. A plan is not a completed result. A source review is not automatically runtime verification. A successful website deployment verifies the documentation build/deploy workflow, not every BitcoinII technical claim on the site.

The current records establish, among other things:

  • bounded Windows v31.1.0 mainnet startup, peer discovery, cookie RPC, partial initial sync, shutdown/restart, and disposable-wallet isolation;
  • isolated zero-peer regtest wallet/PSBT creation, signing, finalization, decoding, mempool acceptance, and local submission;
  • source-confirmed mainnet ShockWave, replay-protection, data-restriction, and fork-aware-header-sync paths;
  • current public explorer/API/WebSocket/Electrum reachability observations;
  • current exchange confirmation-policy observations supporting a provisional MoreBC2 50-confirmation normal-deposit baseline;
  • current release asset inventory/digests and verified target-commit evidence, with explicit binary-authentication limits.

They do not establish universal production readiness, permanent service uptime, successful public transaction propagation, external-signer compatibility, reproducible binaries, or deterministic transaction finality.

Use these pages for unresolved work:

The remaining high-value work is increasingly execution/operations oriented: long-duration/current-release node behavior, optional indexes/pruning, controlled ShockWave vectors, external-signer/replay-domain compatibility, production custody/deposit workflows, chainwork-aware settlement examples, and periodic service rechecks.

Planning/checklist pages remain useful, but should never be cited as if they are execution records:

When a plan is executed, create or update a dated result record rather than silently converting the plan into evidence.

Historical records remain version-scoped. In particular, v29.1.0 Windows/node/release records continue to be useful evidence for that environment, but they are not upgraded to v31.1.0 by wording changes.

Current-facing pages should prefer the September v31 records where they answer the same question.

  • Older verification index — historical/superseded navigation.
  • Verification dashboard — legacy manually maintained dashboard concept.
  • earlier invite-only/private-review coordination pages — project-management history, not current evidence.
  • Name the release/ref, platform, network, date, and environment for runtime evidence.
  • Keep source review, runtime testing, public-service observation, and operational policy distinct.
  • Do not infer public broadcast from local zero-peer sendrawtransaction.
  • Do not infer wallet compatibility from Electrum reachability or Bitcoin-style address formats.
  • Do not infer service independence from similar/different hostnames alone.
  • Do not call an exchange confirmation count a consensus constant or cryptographic finality rule.
  • Preserve old dated evidence; add new records for new releases/tests.
  • Recheck time-sensitive public services before using them as current recommendations.

Status: Reviewed / Partial
Primary evidence checked: Current verification records/indexes, completed v31 Source Atlas/Architecture audits, September runtime/public-infrastructure records, and September exchange evidence
Notes: The verification navigation is current. Remaining Partial status reflects genuine unexecuted tests and operational unknowns, not an unaudited section.